Talk:What is Next
From WikipediaStory
Measuring the perceived quality of the chapter, over time
I think it might be instructive to gauge contributors' satisfaction with the final chapter, as it evolves over time. This way, we can get a sense of when consensus is arriving at "satisfaction" with the product. Let's use a 10-point scale, where 1 is 'completely unacceptable and should never be published', and 10 is 'excellent piece of journalistic literature'. I would move that at least a few contributors should be rating this an "8", "9", or "10" before it is even considered for press. I'll get the voting going below. -- Thekohser 13:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Rating 4. -- Thekohser 13:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
